🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in local state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal measures, such as seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."